Hardware does not
integrate itself
Racking, shuttles, robots and a loading dock from four suppliers are four islands until something tells them what to do and in what order. That layer is the difference between an automated warehouse and a warehouse with automation in it.
Four layers, one behaviour
Each layer answers a different question. Confusing them is how automation projects end up running well below design rate.
Warehouse management
Inventory, locations, orders and replenishment. If you already run a WMS you keep it — we integrate to it rather than replacing your system of record.
Warehouse execution
Decides sequence and priority in real time: which order releases next, which lane it draws from, which robot goes. This is where throughput is won or lost.
Warehouse control
Speaks to the machines. Shuttles, lifts, conveyor, AMR fleets and loading systems, each with its own protocol, coordinated as one.
Visibility and diagnostics
Live throughput, utilisation per device, exception queues and fault history — so a slowdown gets diagnosed instead of guessed at.
You keep your system of record
We are an integrator, not a software vendor trying to replace your WMS. If it holds your inventory today, it keeps holding it.
Integration scope is the most commonly underestimated line in an automation budget. We scope it explicitly and separately, because a system that runs at 70% of design rate is almost always an integration problem, not a hardware one.
Ask us what the software actually costs
Bring the WMS you run, the hosts it talks to and the machines you want coordinated. We will scope the integration as its own line item so it cannot quietly become the overrun.